Las mejores herramientas manuales para la gestión de resúmenes y revisión por pares en 2026

Consejos y Trucos

Even in 2026, many academic conferences and journals rely on manual tools to manage abstract submissions and peer review. While advanced platforms exist, manual workflows built using tools like Google Forms, Google Sheets, and Google Drive are still widely used—especially for small to mid-sized conferences.

The key is not just using these tools—but using them correctly. In this guide, we break down the best manual tools, how to use them step by step, and how to build a structured workflow that actually works.

Manual Workflow Overview

A typical manual workflow uses multiple tools working together:

• Google Forms → Collect submissions
• Google Sheets → Track papers and status
• Google Drive → Store documents
• Email (Gmail/Outlook) → Communicate with authors and reviewers

Each tool plays a critical role in managing the full submission and review lifecycle.

Step 1: Collect Abstracts Using Google Forms

Google Forms is one of the best free tools for collecting abstract submissions.

• Create fields for title, abstract, keywords
• Add author details (name, email, affiliation)
• Use file upload option for paper submission

How to use:

• Go to Google Forms
• Create a new form
• Add structured fields for submission
• Link responses to Google Sheets

This creates a centralized system where all submissions are automatically recorded.

Step 2: Track Submissions Using Google Sheets

Google Sheets acts as the control center for your entire conference workflow.

• Track submission status (submitted, under review, accepted)
• Assign reviewers manually
• Monitor deadlines and progress

How to use:

• Link Google Forms responses to Sheets
• Add columns for reviewer assignment
• Use filters and color coding for tracking

This helps organizers maintain visibility across all submissions.

Step 3: Store Papers Using Google Drive

Google Drive is ideal for storing and organizing submitted papers.

• Create folders by track or topic
• Store submitted PDFs and documents
• Share access with reviewers

How to use:

• Create main conference folder
• Organize subfolders by category
• Use consistent naming conventions

Proper organization prevents confusion and data loss.

Step 4: Manage Peer Review via Email and Docs

Peer review is typically handled manually using email and shared documents.

• Send papers to reviewers via email
• Collect feedback using Google Docs or Word
• Update review status in Sheets

How to use:

• Assign reviewers manually in spreadsheet
• Email paper links from Google Drive
• Collect and consolidate feedback

Clear communication is critical to avoid delays.

Advantages of Manual Tools

• Free and accessible tools
• Flexible workflow setup
• Easy to start for small conferences

Challenges to Consider

• Time-consuming coordination
• Manual reviewer assignment
• High risk of errors
• Difficult to scale

When Manual Tools Work Best

Manual tools are ideal for:

• Small conferences
• Workshops and pilot events
• Limited submission volumes

A Better Approach: Moving Toward Integrated Platforms

While manual tools can work, managing multiple systems becomes complex as conferences grow. This is where integrated platforms like PeerSubmit provide a significant advantage.

Instead of using multiple disconnected tools, PeerSubmit brings everything into one place:

• Centralized paper submission system
• AI-powered reviewer recommendation
• Built-in abstract management
• Automated workflows and tracking

• Paper submission management
• AI reviewer recommendation
• Automated workflows
• Real-time tracking

Final Thoughts

Manual tools like Google Forms, Sheets, and Drive can effectively support abstract management and peer review—when used with structured workflows.

However, as conferences scale, relying on multiple tools becomes inefficient and time-consuming. Platforms like PeerSubmit simplify the entire process and make peer review up to 70% faster by eliminating manual coordination and automating key workflows.