Best ConfTool Alternatives for Conference Management

Industry Insight

ConfTool has been widely used for managing academic conferences, particularly for abstract submission, participant registration, and event organization. It provides a structured system that helps organizers handle multiple aspects of conference workflows in one place.

However, as conferences evolve, many organizers are now looking for better ConfTool alternatives that offer improved usability, automation, and flexibility—especially for managing complex peer review workflows and large submission volumes.

Modern academic conferences require more than just submission tracking. They require systems that can streamline abstract submission, automate peer review processes, and provide real-time visibility into the entire conference lifecycle.

👉 Explore complete conference management workflow

Why Organizers Are Moving Beyond ConfTool

ConfTool is functional and reliable, but it reflects a traditional approach to conference management. As expectations increase, its limitations become more noticeable—especially in terms of usability and workflow flexibility.

Common challenges include:

• Complex and less intuitive user interface
• Manual coordination in peer review workflows
• Limited flexibility in customizing submission and review processes
• Dependence on manual communication and follow-ups

These challenges can slow down conference workflows, particularly for international conferences handling diverse submission types and large participant bases.

What to Look for in a ConfTool Alternative

Choosing the right alternative is about improving efficiency, not just replacing software.

A modern conference management system should offer:

• Flexible abstract and paper submission systems
• Customizable peer review workflows
• AI-powered reviewer assignment
• Automated communication and notifications
• Real-time dashboards and reporting

👉 Learn more about abstract submission systems and peer review workflows

Top ConfTool Alternatives for Conference Management

1. PeerSubmit (AI-First Conference Management Platform)

PeerSubmit is built for how modern academic conferences actually operate today. While traditional platforms like ConfTool focus on managing submissions and registrations, PeerSubmit goes further by optimizing the entire conference lifecycle—from abstract submission to peer review, decision-making, and final program creation.

At its core, PeerSubmit is not just a submission system—it is a complete conference management platform that connects every stage of the workflow into a unified experience. This eliminates the need for organizers to rely on multiple tools, spreadsheets, or manual coordination between systems.

👉 Understand full conference workflow

Flexible Abstract Submission & Custom Form Builder

In real-world conferences, submission requirements are rarely fixed. Different tracks, sessions, or committees often require different types of data—ranging from abstracts and full papers to extended synopses and supplementary materials.

PeerSubmit addresses this complexity with a highly flexible abstract submission system that allows organizers to design fully customized submission forms.

Organizers can:

• Create custom submission, author, and metadata forms
• Reuse forms across multiple conferences
• Modify forms at any time—even during live submissions
• Support multilingual forms for global audiences

This level of flexibility is especially important for international conferences where requirements evolve during the submission phase.

👉 Explore abstract submission systems

AI-Powered Reviewer Assignment (Core Differentiator)

One of the most time-consuming and error-prone parts of conference management is reviewer assignment. In traditional systems like ConfTool, this process is often manual or based on limited filtering criteria.

PeerSubmit replaces this with an AI-powered reviewer recommendation engine that uses semantic understanding and vector-based matching to connect submissions with the most relevant reviewers.

Instead of relying on titles or keywords alone, the system analyzes the actual content of submissions and reviewer expertise to ensure better alignment.

This results in:

• More accurate reviewer-paper matching
• Balanced reviewer workloads
• Reduced bias and improved fairness
• Faster reviewer assignment process

👉 Learn how AI reviewer matching works

End-to-End Peer Review Workflow Management

PeerSubmit supports fully customizable peer review workflows, allowing organizers to define how submissions are evaluated based on the needs of their conference.

Whether you are running a single-blind, double-blind, or hybrid review process, the system adapts to your workflow rather than forcing a predefined structure.

Key capabilities include:

• Custom review forms with scoring and evaluation criteria
• Multiple review rounds and decision stages
• Reviewer assignment tracking and performance visibility
• Conflict-of-interest management

👉 Explore peer review systems

Workflow Automation & Smart Communication

One of the biggest inefficiencies in conference management comes from manual coordination—sending reminders, tracking deadlines, and following up with reviewers.

PeerSubmit automates these processes, ensuring that workflows move forward without constant intervention from organizers.

The platform enables:

• Automated reviewer reminders and deadline notifications
• Bulk and personalized email communication
• Real-time tracking dashboards for submissions and reviews
• Status updates across all workflow stages

This significantly reduces delays and improves coordination across large program committees.

Decision Management & Conference Program Creation

After the review process, organizers need to move quickly into decision-making and program creation. In many systems, this stage is disconnected from earlier workflows.

PeerSubmit keeps everything integrated:

• Assign accept/reject decisions based on review data
• Group accepted papers into sessions or tracks
• Build structured conference programs

This ensures a seamless transition from review to final conference planning.

Reporting, Analytics & Outputs

PeerSubmit provides detailed reporting tools that help organizers make informed decisions and prepare conference outputs efficiently.

Organizers can:

• Generate abstract booklets and proceedings
• Export submission data to CSV or Excel
• Analyze submission trends and reviewer performance
• Maintain a complete submission archive

👉 Explore all PeerSubmit features

Built for Global & Scalable Conferences

PeerSubmit is designed to support conferences across regions including the US, UK, India, Europe, and beyond. Its cloud-based infrastructure allows organizers to manage submissions, reviews, and decisions from anywhere.

With multilingual support, flexible workflows, and scalable architecture, it adapts to both small academic symposiums and large international conferences without adding complexity.

PeerSubmit is not just a ConfTool alternative—it is a complete upgrade designed for the future of academic conference management.

To explore all capabilities in detail, visit:
👉 PeerSubmit Features
👉 View Pricing
👉 Help Center & Documentation
👉 How AI reviewer assignment works

2. Ex Ordo

Ex Ordo is a well-established conference management platform that focuses on improving usability while maintaining structured academic workflows. It is often preferred by organizers who want a more intuitive alternative to traditional systems without completely changing how conference processes are managed.

One of its primary strengths lies in its user-friendly interface. Compared to platforms like ConfTool or Microsoft CMT, Ex Ordo reduces the learning curve for authors, reviewers, and committee members, making it easier to navigate submission, review, and scheduling processes.

From a workflow perspective, Ex Ordo supports:

• Abstract and paper submission management with customizable fields
• Peer review coordination with scoring, feedback, and evaluation criteria
• Conference program creation, including session scheduling and track management

This makes it a reliable choice for conferences that want structured workflows with improved usability.

However, while Ex Ordo simplifies the user experience, it largely follows traditional workflow models. Core processes such as reviewer assignment, workflow coordination, and decision management still depend on manual configuration and organizer involvement.

As conferences scale or become more complex, the lack of deeper automation and AI-driven optimization can limit efficiency, particularly in large or international events.

3. Oxford Abstracts

Oxford Abstracts is designed with flexibility in mind, allowing organizers to tailor submission and review workflows to match the specific needs of their conference. This makes it particularly useful for events that do not follow standard formats or require frequent adjustments during the planning process.

Unlike rigid systems, Oxford Abstracts enables organizers to configure workflows based on different submission types, tracks, and evaluation methods. This adaptability is valuable for conferences that involve diverse research areas or evolving program structures.

Key capabilities include:

• Flexible abstract and paper submission workflows
• Customizable peer review processes with scoring and feedback options
• Program building tools for organizing sessions and tracks

This level of customization makes Oxford Abstracts suitable for organizers who need control over how their conference is structured.

However, while the platform excels in flexibility, it primarily focuses on configuring workflows rather than optimizing them. Tasks such as reviewer assignment, coordination, and workflow progression still require manual input and oversight.

For conferences looking to reduce administrative workload through automation or AI-driven systems, this can become a limitation as scale and complexity increase.

4. Microsoft CMT

Microsoft CMT (Conference Management Toolkit) is widely used in academic conferences, particularly in research-intensive fields. It provides a structured environment for managing submissions, assigning reviewers, and tracking peer review processes.

Its strength lies in its ability to handle large volumes of submissions and support detailed review workflows, making it a common choice for established conferences and research communities.

From a functional standpoint, Microsoft CMT offers:

• Paper and abstract submission management
• Reviewer assignment and peer review tracking
• Role-based access for organizers, reviewers, and authors

However, the platform is often considered complex and less intuitive compared to modern systems. It requires a higher level of familiarity, and onboarding new users can take time.

Additionally, workflows in CMT are largely structured and require manual coordination, particularly for reviewer assignment and communication. This can create inefficiencies in conferences with tight timelines or large, distributed committees.

As conference management continues to evolve toward automation and AI-assisted workflows, traditional systems like CMT may not provide the level of flexibility and efficiency expected by modern organizers.

AI Is Transforming Conference Management

AI is redefining how conferences manage submissions and peer review.

• Automated reviewer assignment
• Semantic analysis of submissions
• Faster decision-making workflows

Regional Perspective: Choosing the Right Conference Management Tool

Conference management requirements vary significantly across regions, and selecting the right conference management software depends on factors such as submission volume, academic standards, budget constraints, and technology adoption.

What works for a large international conference may not be suitable for a smaller academic event or a rapidly growing research community. Understanding these regional differences is essential when evaluating ConfTool alternatives or any modern conference submission system.

In the United States, academic conferences often deal with high submission volumes and large program committees. This makes scalability, automation, and AI-powered reviewer assignment critical. Organizers rely on platforms that can reduce manual coordination, balance reviewer workloads, and provide real-time tracking of submissions and peer review progress.

In the United Kingdom and Europe, the focus is more on structured peer review workflows, transparency, and academic integrity. Conferences in these regions often require clearly defined evaluation criteria, standardized review processes such as single-blind or double-blind review, and systems that ensure consistency across multiple review stages.

In India, academic conferences are expanding rapidly, with increasing participation from universities and research institutions. Organizers often prioritize affordable and flexible conference management systems that still provide essential features such as abstract submission, reviewer assignment, and automated communication. Ease of use is particularly important for teams managing conferences with limited administrative resources.

Across regions like Canada and Singapore, there is a growing preference for modern, cloud-based conference submission systems that support collaboration, remote participation, and hybrid event formats. These regions are also early adopters of AI-driven workflow automation and data-driven decision-making tools.

In emerging academic markets such as Mexico and Nigeria, accessibility and usability play a crucial role. Organizers prefer platforms that are easy to implement, require minimal training, and support multilingual workflows to enable broader participation across diverse research communities.

Across all regions, one clear trend is emerging: conferences are moving away from rigid, manual systems toward flexible, cloud-based platforms that combine automation, usability, and intelligent workflows. The ability to adapt to regional needs while maintaining global standards is what defines the next generation of conference management systems.

Final Thoughts

ConfTool has been a reliable conference management system for many years, helping organizers manage abstract submission, registration, and basic peer review workflows. It has provided a structured foundation for academic events across different disciplines.

However, the expectations of modern conferences have evolved significantly. Today’s organizers are managing larger submission volumes, more complex review processes, and increasingly global participation. This shift requires platforms that are not only functional, but also flexible, intuitive, and capable of handling dynamic workflows efficiently.

As a result, many organizers are now exploring ConfTool alternatives that offer more advanced capabilities. Modern conference management software is expected to streamline the entire lifecycle—from abstract submission and peer review to decision-making and program creation—while reducing manual effort and improving coordination.

There is also a clear movement toward AI-driven peer review systems, where tasks like reviewer assignment, workflow tracking, and communication are enhanced through automation. This not only improves efficiency but also ensures better accuracy and consistency across the review process.

Whether you are organizing a conference in the US, UK, India, or globally, choosing the right platform directly impacts the experience of authors, reviewers, and committees—and ultimately determines the success of your event.

If you're evaluating a transition from ConfTool, the key is to choose a system that aligns with modern expectations—one that combines flexibility, automation, and intelligent workflows without increasing operational complexity.

👉 Book a Demo