How do organizers view conference analytics?

Paige Watson

Updated on 10 March 2026

• Copy Link

Conference analytics help organizers understand submission trends, review progress, and overall conference performance. By monitoring analytics, organizers can quickly identify bottlenecks in the review process and ensure the conference timeline stays on track.

PeerSubmit provides an analytics dashboard that displays important metrics such as total submissions, review completion status, reviewer activity, and decision outcomes.

Step 1: Log in to Your PeerSubmit Account

Start by logging in to your PeerSubmit organizer account.

• Open the PeerSubmit login page.
• Enter your email address and password.
• Click Login to access your dashboard.

Step 2: Open the Conference Dashboard

After logging in, select the conference you want to analyze.

• Navigate to All Conferences.
• Find your conference in the list.
• Click Manage Conference to open the conference dashboard.

Step 3: View the Analytics Overview

The conference dashboard provides a summary of key performance metrics.

• Total number of submissions
• Submissions currently under review
• Completed reviews
• Accepted and rejected submissions
• Reviewer participation statistics

Step 4: Monitor Submission Progress

Organizers can track submission progress directly from the analytics dashboard.

• View submissions by status (pending, under review, decision made).
• Track review completion progress.
• Identify submissions waiting for reviewer assignments.

Step 5: Analyze Reviewer Activity

PeerSubmit analytics also help monitor reviewer participation.

• Number of reviews completed by each reviewer
• Pending review assignments
• Average review completion time

This helps organizers ensure that reviewers complete evaluations before the deadline.

Benefits of Using Conference Analytics

• Monitor submission trends
• Track peer review progress
• Identify delays in the review process
• Make data-driven conference decisions

Using analytics helps organizers manage conferences more efficiently and ensures that the peer review process remains transparent and organized.